close
2015年01月30日 17:35
記者游雁双／綜合報導
五月天主唱阿信（陳信宏）平時愛逛PTT板和網友互動，也會在臉書和粉絲聊天，不僅在歌壇有亮眼的表現，在網路上的人氣也是非常高。而他近日公開自己的「特殊癖好」，像是喜歡汽油味、剝橘子味以及蚊香味等等，引起許多粉絲留言分享日常的詭異習慣，其中有些答案讓他十分傻眼。
▲阿信先前在演唱會上賣力地演出。（圖／資料照／記者林政平攝）
阿信28日在臉書上提到，雖然冷水和熱水倒在杯子裡的聲音不一樣，但自己很喜歡聽熱水倒杯裡的聲音「問題是，我不喜歡喝熱水。」親民的他大方透露自己除了喜歡過汽油味以外，也愛過香水橡皮擦的草莓口味、新書本的雪銅紙味、陰天早上味以及雷陣雨前的空氣味。他的自爆引起網友熱烈討論，許多人還不甘示弱地留言分享特別的「怪癖！」
此外，阿信看完粉絲的怪癖以後，直呼「大家果然沒讓我失望，超多怪傢伙。」他30日在臉書上指出很多網友都喜歡地下室味，也有圖書館味、商場冷氣味，以及剛割完草地味等等。當他看到有人留言「莫文蔚」、「四分衛」和「五月天那五位」時，感到驚訝且非常傻眼，其他粉絲則是哈哈大笑，並針對「五月天那五位」反問：「總裁大人，可以借我聞一下是什麼味道嗎？」
▼阿信在臉書上發文後一小時，即有5萬多人按讚與300多個分享。（圖／翻攝五中秋烤肉食材 觀音月天 阿信臉書）
2017-01-0503:00
CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University （NTU） president Yang Pan-chyr （楊泮池） was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te （林達德）, who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua （許文華） said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan （閔明源） and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen （張上淳）.“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang （郭明良） — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo （黃光國） accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh （嚴孟祿）, a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million （US$208,617） Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council （now Ministry of Science and Technology） official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun （劉源俊）, president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray （張慶瑞） and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
旺報【記者陳建瑜╱綜合恆春火鍋推薦 平價年菜預購推薦報導】
北韓領導人金正恩1日發表新年談話時稱，北韓研發的洲際彈道飛彈試射在即。美國準總統川普3日在推特上回嗆，北韓的飛彈能到達美國是「門兒都沒有」；隨後再度發文批評，中國單邊從美國獲取貿易利益，卻不幫忙阻止北韓，「幹得好」。
金正恩日前在新年談話時特別強調，洲際飛彈的試射準備已進入最後階段，並揚言若美韓不取消2、3月軍事演習，北韓將持續強化包含核武在內的攻高雄年菜外帶2017擊能力。
射程達美國 門都沒有
烤肉食譜 海鮮對此，川普3日在推特上連發2文，並再度對批評大陸。他第一則推文指出，北韓方才聲明，研發射程範圍可達美國的核武器已到達最後階段，「門兒都沒有」（It won't happen!）。
隔不到1小時，他再度推文批評大陸；他說，中國完全單邊的從對美國貿易中，獲取龐大利益，但在北韓問題上卻不幫忙，最後加了一個字「 Nice」，反諷中國「真是幹得好啊！」
事實上，這並非川普首次批評大陸在北韓問題上並未盡力。川普去年12月接受美媒專訪時曾說，講實在話，中國也沒在北韓問題上幫到忙，北韓如今擁有核武，中國可以處理這個問題，但他們根本不願幫忙。
對此，南韓外交部發言人趙俊赫3日解讀，這是川普對金正恩日前挑釁的明確警告，韓方認為，包括川普在內的美方高層，已經認知到北韓核威脅的嚴峻性和緊迫性，韓方正與美國現任政府及新一屆政府進行緊密的戰略溝通。
首份機密情報 有關朝核
雖然川普的北韓政策尚未明朗，但路透1日報導引述美國情報高層指出，川普首份且當時是唯一的機密情報說明要求，就是有關北韓核項目；而白宮準國家安全顧問佛林也對北韓核項目很感興趣。雖然川普並未要求獲得報告時間，但路透推定可能是1月中旬。
1BB7F4D06DDBE9EC
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
